Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Diamond Plastics Corporation v. Caudill
as 8:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Diamond Plastics Corporation
Defendant:
John Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Anderson et al v. Fortra LLC
as 0:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Valerie Anderson, Robert Taylor, Alauntae Butts and others
Defendant:
Fortra, LLC and Fortra LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gonzalez et al v. Fortra, LLC
as 0:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Iraida Gonzalez and Linda Caudill
Defendant:
Fortra, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Adkins et al v. Flash Market LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Khurshonda Adkins, Elizabeth Alvarez, Jalyn Anthony and others
Defendant:
Flash Market LLC and PFMFC Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Caudill v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
David Alan Caudill
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Benjamin et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02170
Plaintiff:
Norman Francis, Trumaine Turner, Adam Faizi and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cordingly et al v. 3M Company et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2019cv02103
Plaintiff:
Bryan Cox, Clifford Riley, Peter Carothers and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Emerald Pointe, LLC v. Taney County Planning Commission et al
as 6:2017cv03182
Plaintiff:
Emerald Pointe, LLC
Defendant:
Taney County Planning Commission , Taney County Board of Adjustment , Steve Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
