Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 23-1550
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES T. DEWEES, Sheriff of Carroll County, BEN CRAFT, Deputy Sheriff, DOUGLAS KRIETE, Deputy Sheriff and others
Jane Doe v. James Dewees
as 20-1736
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY K. SMITH, District Court Administrative Clerk, JOYCE SCHAUM, Contractor with CONMED, UNIDENTIFIED CONTRACTOR, CONMED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Robert Payne v. Jailer Puriti
as 12-6096
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PAYNE, a/k/a Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant - Appellee:
JAILER PURITIS, CCDC and CHARLESTON COUNTY
Robert Payne v. Jailer Luca
as 11-7733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PAYNE, a/k/a Robert Harvie Payne
Defendant - Appellee:
JAILER LUCAS, CCDC, CHARLESTON COUNTY and CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christopher Odom v. FNU LNU Charleston County
as 11-7063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU LNU CHARLESTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Responsible Authority, FNU LNU CCOH RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY, FNU LNU CCDC NEGLIGENCE INJURY INSURANCE POLICY HOLDER and others
Christopher Odom v. CCDC FNU LNU Injury Negligence
as 11-7065
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CCDC FNU LNU INJURY NEGLIGENCE INSURANCE HOLDER, FNU LNU RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITY, FNU LAGUD and others
Payne v. Puritis et al
as 6:2011cv01716
Plaintiff:
Robert Payne
Defendant:
CCDC Jailer Puritis and Charleston County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Insurance Holding MPPD et al
as 3:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Odom
Defendant:
Insurance Holding MPPD, Lucas, CCDC Tact Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02482
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
