Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Dobner et al v. Tweedell et al
as 1:2009cv03077
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brendan Dobner and Kirsten Marie Dobner
Defendant:
Billy Alexander Tweedell, Central Transport, Inc., Central Transport International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02432
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
American Central Transport, Inc. v. Strickland
as 4:2009cv00649
Plaintiff:
American Central Transport, Inc. and American Central Transport, Inc.
Defendant:
Bernadette Strickland
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Llanes v. Central Transport, Inc.
as 1:2009cv21052
Plaintiff:
David Llanes
Defendant:
Central Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Dupree v. Central Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03030
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dupree
Defendant:
Central Transport, Inc. and Bob Vogul
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SCHWEITZER et al v. CENTRAL TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 5:2008cv01973
Plaintiff:
BRUCE SCHWEITZER and CONNIE SCHWEITZER
Defendant:
CENTRAL TRANSPORT, INC. and BIG JOHN INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stark v. Central Transport, Inc.
as 3:2008cv05041
Plaintiff:
Bruce Stark
Defendant:
Central Transport, Inc. and Central Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
