Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure et al
as 3:2015cv00307
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Dipino et al
as 8:2014cv03016
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Brown
Defendant:
Chief Dipino, Charles Knight, Sean Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Ramon et al
as 6:2014cv00679
Plaintiff:
Charles Knight
Defendant:
Ramon and Devin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. et al v. Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
as 3:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Axcess Medical Clinic, Inc. , Kenneth Charles Knight and Fitzhugh Lee Neal, Jr.
Defendant:
Mississippi State Board of Medical Licensure
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Knight v. Livingston et al
as 1:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Charles Knight
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, FNU Weiaver and FNU Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: 2009 Polaris Ranger ATV
as 5:2013mc00008
Movant:
United States of America
Claimant:
Charles Knight
KNIGHT v. SUPERINTENDANT
as 1:2012cv00890
Petitioner:
CHARLES KNIGHT
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Janice Knight v. City of Ozark, et al
as 10-15508
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANICE KNIGHT, as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Knight, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF OZARK and JIMMY CULBREATH
Duyn et al v. Cameron International Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02680
Defendant:
Cameron International Corporation , BP, plc, BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stacey Van Duyn , Charles Knight and Margaret Ann Brame
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
