Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Yonna Acosta, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3617
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kyle Scruggs, Kris Douglas, Thomas Whitby and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Acosta et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv01899
Plaintiff:
Jansen Ferguson, Darin Spurger, Thomas Holt and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
MedShift, LLC v. Pelle, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Charles Morgan, Pelle, LLC doing business as Pelle Medical Spa and Charles W. Morgan
Plaintiff:
MedShift, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Pelle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv67477
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv48376
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25312
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MORGAN
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GERRISH v. MORGAN et al
as 4:2020cv00014
Plaintiff:
JOYCE GERRISH
Defendant:
JAMES GARDNER, CHARLES MORGAN, CITY OF GEORGETOWN, INDIANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. GEORGETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00181
Defendant:
TOWN OF GEORGETOWN, INDIANA, CHARLES MORGAN and GEORGETOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
RIGOBERTO RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Morgan v. Michael Fiorentino, Jr., et al
as 19-2623
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, LOCK HAVEN UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL FIORENTINO, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MORGAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
