Cases 1 - 10 of 15
North v. Daniel et al
as 7:2026cv03524
Plaintiff:
Charles North
Defendant:
Karen L. Daniel, J. Eric Evans, Sandra L. Fenwick and others
Petitioner:
John Richey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b)ss Stockholder Suit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04586
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Income One, LLC v. Charles North Housing, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02076
Plaintiff:
Income One, LLC
Defendant:
Charles North Housing, Inc., Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Honora W. Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NORTH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2017cv01889
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NORTH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHBEL T. WALL, GEORGE A. VOSE, JAKE GADSDEN and others
Laurence v. Wall, et al
as 11-1307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NORMAN LAURENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, WILLIAM BEGONES, PAUL MARIORENZI and others
Defendant:
JAKE GADSDEN, JAMES WEEDEN, DONNA COLLINS and others
Peoplessouth Bank v. Lisenby et al (MEMBER CASE)
as 1:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
Peoplessouth Bank
Defendant:
Robert O. Lisenby, Jr. , Charles North and Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
North et al v. Cermak Auto Auction, L.L.C.
as 1:2010cv03882
Plaintiff:
Charles North and Jenna Carlson
Defendant:
Cermak Auto Auction, L.L.C., Paul Flores, Leslie Tadilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
