Cases 41 - 50 of 209
LUBNOW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv89499
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT LUBNOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CANTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87819
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SCOTT CANTY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LMV Thirteen Piedmont Holdings v. Journal Construction
as 1:2020cv01128
Defendant:
Journal Construction
Plaintiff:
LMV Thirteen Piedmont Holdings
Petitioner:
Charles Scott
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scott v. LaPorte County Community Corrections et al
as 3:2020cv00054
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott and Charles H Scott
Defendant:
Collins, LaPorte County Community Corrections and Robert Neary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Matrix Residential LLC v. Scott
as 1:2019cv05641
Defendant:
Charles Scott
Plaintiff:
Matrix Residential LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thomas Scott v. Stuart Sherman
as 19-17190
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS CHARLES SCOTT
Respondent / Appellee:
STUART SHERMAN, Warden
Scott v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2019cv00957
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott and Charles HN Scott
Defendant:
LaPorte County of, Indiana State of and Michigan City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akins et al v. Riddell, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00121
Defendant:
Riddell Sports Group, Inc., All American Sports Corporation, Riddell, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Howard Akins, Charles Scott Akins and Emillia Kay Akins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00798
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail, Quality Correctional Care LLC and Dr. Tchettchat
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
