Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crazythunder v. USA
as 3:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Cherrell B. Crazythunder
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Footman v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2022cv04584
Plaintiff:
Cherrell Carson Footman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cherrell Footman v. Andrew Saul
as 21-1116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERRELL CARSON FOOTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
FOOTMAN v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01200
Plaintiff:
CHERRELL CARSON FOOTMAN
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Myers v. Colvin
as 8:2016cv02366
Plaintiff:
Cherrel Myers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bethune-Hill et al v. Virginia State Board of Elections et al
as 3:2014cv00852
Plaintiff:
Golden Bethune-Hill, Christa Brooks, Chauncey Brown and others
Defendant:
Virginia State Board of Elections, James B. Alcorn, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
OneVirginia2021: Virginians for Fair Redistricting
Intervenor Defendant:
Virginia House of Delegates, William J. Howell and M. Kirkland Cox
Special Master:
Bernard Grofman
Interested Party:
Virginia State Conference of NAACP Branches, New Virginia Majority, Princeton University and others
Petitioner:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bannister Associates v. Gibson
as 8:2012cv02433
Plaintiff:
Bannister Associates
Defendant:
Cherrell Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Barber v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Barber
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Anthony Nwainu and Cherrelle Reddic-Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
