Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tysheed Davis v. Mayor Philadelphia, et al
as 23-1604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MAYOR PHILADELPHIA, CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA CITY COUNCIL, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSIONERS and others
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security
as 23-5021
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carmela Romerio
Defendant / Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Guy Cavallo, Chief Information Officer of U.S. Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Kiran Ahuja, Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR et al
as 2:2022cv04794
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA OFFICE OF THE MAYOR, PHILADELPHIA CITY COUNCIL, PHILADELPHIA CITY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ohio Stands Up!, et al v. HHS, et al
as 21-3995
Plaintiff:
OHIO STANDS UP!
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTEN BECKMAN and DOCTOR DOUGLAS FRANK
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION and others
Jacoby Garrett v. Harold Clarke
as 21-1932
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JACOBY L. GARRETT
Defendant / Appellant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, individually and in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, RICHARD A. DAVIS, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Information Officer of the Virginia Department of Corrections and FELICIA V. STRETCHER, individually and in her official capacity as Information Technology Administrators and Operations Manager for the Virginia Department of Corrections
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ohio Stands Up! et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2020cv02814
Defendant:
Secretary Azar, The National Center for Health Statistics, John and Jane Doe(s) 1-20 and others
Intervenor Defendant:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Plaintiff:
Kristen Beckman and Ohio Stands Up!
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5232
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Travis Arnold, Tony Bachtell and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Adam Dale, Mary C. Woo, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Victor W. Hobbs, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Keypoint Government Solutions, a Delaware corporation and others
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Mgmt.
as 17-5217
In Re:
In re: U.S. Office of Personnel Management Data Security Breach Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Robert Crawford, Adam Dale and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
National Treasury Employees Union, Stephen Howell, John Ortino and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Personnel Management, Beth F. Cobert, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity, Kathleen McGettigan, Acting Director of United States Office of Personnel Management, in her Official Capacity and others
Tariq Belt v. DEA
as 16-7642
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TARIQ LIYUEN ADEVEMI BELT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEA CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER, DEA BALTIMORE FIELD OFFICE, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Agency/Buisness and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
