Cases 1 - 10 of 631
Burks v. Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency
as 2:2024cv02330
Defendant:
Licking County Child Support Enforcement Agency and CSEA
Plaintiff:
Jordan Burks
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PD v. Sampson et al
as 2:2024cv10894
Plaintiff:
P. D.
Defendant:
James Sampson, Tamara L. Spencer, Carolyn Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doherty et al v. Simplay3 Company
as 2:2024cv10847
Plaintiff:
(minor child) Aarron Doherty, Elleanora Doherty, Aarron Doherty and others
Defendant:
The Simplay3 Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joy v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Joy
Defendant:
Larry McKenzie, Tyler Burchyett and 25th Judicial District Child Support Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lemke et al v. Change Healthcare Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Sara Lemke, Revival Therapy, P.C., EA Health Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc., UnitedHealth Group Inc., UnitedHealthcare Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Huntley v. Child Support Enforcement
as 5:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Edwin Huntley
Respondent:
Child Support Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hunt v. Agape Child & Family Services, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02086
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hunt
Defendant:
Agape Child & Family Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
