Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stoller Enterprises, Inc. v. George
as 4:2022cv03010
Plaintiff:
Stoller Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher George
First Horizon Bank et al v. Frank
as 1:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
First Horizon Bank and First Horizon Corporation
Defendant:
Christopher George Frank
Arnone v. County of Dallas
as 21-10597
Defendant / Appellee:
William T. Hill, Jr., in his Individual capacity, County of Dallas County, Texas and Ron Goethals, in his Individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher George Arnone
USA v. Christopher Follette
as 21-30148
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE FOLLETTE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Christopher Miller
as 20-4635
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE MILLER, a/k/a Chris, a/k/a Michael Nathan Hamilton
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
George v. Starbucks Corporation
as 20-4050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher George, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, April Boddie, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals, Chelsea Maley, on behalf of themselves and a class of similarly situated individuals and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Starbucks Corporation, DBA Starbucks Coffee Company
Pable v. Chicago Transit Authority et al
as 1:2019cv07868
Plaintiff:
Christopher George Pable
Defendant:
Clever Devices, Ltd. and Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Duffek v. State of Nebraska
as 19-3538
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher George Duffek
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Nebraska
USA v. Christopher Wiggin
as 19-10810
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GEORGE WIGGIN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
