Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02816
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
USA v. Christopher Bounds
as 20-30174
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM BOUNDS, AKA Jonathan James Montgomery, AKA Christopher W. Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Peck et al v. David Randolph Smith & Associates et al
as 3:2020cv00634
Plaintiff:
Matthew C. Peck and Jeffrey Motluck
Defendant:
Lyon Chadwick, Christopher W. Smith, David Randolph Smith & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mauricio Godoy v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 19-17499
Defendant / Appellee:
JEAN WEISS, MCSP-Md.-ADA-Associate Warden, GENEVIE CANDELARIA, CIM-Education, Supervisor, W. VAUGHN, LL&S, State Official, CDCR and others
Defendant:
UCC-CIM-ICC, INSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, J. ANDRES, DDP-Prison Guard Sgt., VINCENT S. CULLEN, Dir. Correct.Ser.-CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy
Smith v. Quintana
as 5:2019cv00098
Petitioner:
Christopher W. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Godoy v. Brown et al
as 4:2018cv06650
Defendant:
Briggs Karl, Dean Borders, E. Whitlock and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Edwin Chick, Donald Shomaker, Donald Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. LARIVA
as 2:2015cv00027
Respondent:
L. LARIVA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER W. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Devine et al v. City of Hampton, Virginia
as 4:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Devine , Nathaniel Adibi , William L. Alexander and others
Defendant:
City of Hampton, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
