Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Ackerman et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv12430
Plaintiff:
Angelique Ackerman, Maria Acosta, Arleen Adams and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LEWIS v. GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2022cv04867
Defendant:
STACY GARRITY, GOVERNMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL ASSEMBLY and others
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KENNEDY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 5:2021cv04667
Plaintiff:
EDWARD THOMAS KENNEDY
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THOMAS W. WOLF, JOSUA D. SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cindy Adam v. Frank Barone, et al
as 21-2092
Defendant / Appellee:
GREEN POGO LLC NEW JERSEY, GREEN POGO LLC DELAWARE, ADVANCED BEAUTY LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CINDY ADAM, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Adams v. Liberty Bank et al
as 3:2020cv01601
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adams
Defendant:
Liberty Bank DOES 1 Through 5, Liberty Bank and Does 1 Through 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAM v. SFLG INC. et al
as 3:2020cv12835
Plaintiff:
CINDY ADAM
Defendant:
SFLG INC. and KURT ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adam v. Barone et al
as 3:2020cv10321
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adam
Defendant:
Frank V. Barone, Fortera Nutra Solutions LLC, Kurt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams v. City of Redding
as 1:2020at00576
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adams
Defendant:
City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adams v. City of Redding
as 2:2020cv01610
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adams
Defendant:
City of Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adam v. Barone et al
as 4:2020cv00761
Plaintiff:
Cindy Adam
Defendant:
Frank V. Barone, Fortera Nutra Solutions LLC, Kurt Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
