Cases 1 - 10 of 8,248
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Volynets v. Bradley County et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Roxana Volynets
Defendant:
Bradley County, City of Cleveland, Tennessee and Willie Espinoza, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv11264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Skilwies v. City of Huber Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SKILWIES
Defendant:
CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION and others
Wright v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Vickie Wright
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Bart Tyner, Mark Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
JOELLE NEW
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, Officer John Doe #1 and Officer John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Myers v. City of Frankfort et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Myers
Defendant:
City of Frankfort, Dustin Bowman and Larry G. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee #112795 v. Lansing, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Darrick Devon Lee #112795
Defendant:
Lansing, City of, Jake Ellis and Zachary Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nationwide Recovery, Incorporated, et al v. City of Detroit, MI
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
NATIONWIDE RECOVERY, INCORPORATED, JULIA HUSSEIN, HUSSEIN M. HUSSEIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
