Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Water Works Board of the City of Leeds, Alabama, The v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2026cv00805
Plaintiff:
Water Works Board of the City of Leeds, Alabama, The
Defendant:
3M Company and North America Fire Equipment Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Victoria Winborn v. City of Leeds, et al
as 26-11582
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA WINBORN
Defendant:
CITY OF LEEDS, CHIEF OF POLICE, LEEDS ALABAMA, C.B. PARSONS and others
Patrick Bishop, Sr. v. Leeds, City of
as 26-11063
Plaintiff:
PATRICK BISHOP, SR.
Defendant:
CITY OF LEEDS
Watson v. City of Leeds
as 2:2026cv00381
Plaintiff:
Bradley Watson
Defendant:
City of Leeds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
City of Leeds, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 1:2020op45088
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Leeds, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Leeds, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma L P et al
as 2:2020cv00201
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt LLC, Mallinckrodt PLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of Leeds, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Phillips v. City of Leeds, Alabama et al
as 2:2018cv01110
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Jacob Scott, Stacey Kerr, City of Leeds, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minor T.I. v. City of Leeds Board of Education et al
as 2:2015cv01704
Plaintiff:
Minor T.I.
Defendant:
City of Leeds Board of Education , John Moore , Ashley Casiday and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
