Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hebert v. CMH Homes, Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv01847
Plaintiff:
Donna L Hebert
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc, CMH Homes, Inc also named as a defendant under its trade name Clayton Homes Gonzales doing business as Clayton Homes Gonzales and Clayton Homes of Gonzales doing business as Clayton Homes #258
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Woodruff v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00248
Plaintiff:
Ashley M. Woodruff
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilbanks v. CMH Homes Inc
as 2:2017cv00670
Plaintiff:
Kerry E Wilbanks
Defendant:
CMH Homes Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trevino v. CMH Homes, Inc. d/b/a Clayton Homes of Donna
as 7:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Griselda Trevino
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. d/b/a Clayton Homes of Donna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Downing et al v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00433
Plaintiff:
Carol E. Downing and Erin W. Downing
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. , Clayton Savannah and CMH Manufacturing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01711
Plaintiff:
Diane Johnson
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
McKinley et al v. CMH Homes Inc
as 2:2011cv02982
Plaintiff:
Rose McKinley , Shameare McKinley , Jamel McKinley and others
Defendant:
CMH Homes Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Millsaps v. Vanderbilt Mortgage And Finance, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00205
Plaintiff:
Lillian Millsaps
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage And Finance, Inc. and CMH Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neporadny v. CMH Homes, Inc.
as 4:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Linda Neporadny
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bridges v. CMH Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bridges
Defendant:
CMH Homes, Inc. , Clayton Homes and Luv Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
