Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chandler v. Jordan et al
as 1:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Bryan Earl Chandler
Defendant:
Morris Lloyd Jordan , Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP , Penske Truck Leasing Co., Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc. , Derek Matthew Sise and XPO Logistics Freight, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ceva Logistics US, Inc. , Morris Lloyd Jordan , Penske Truck Leasing Co., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lawrence v. Con-way Freight, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02392
Plaintiff:
Franklin Lawrence
Defendant:
Con-way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Sealtite Applicators, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01923
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Sealtite Applicators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diebold v. Wilson et al
as 8:2009cv02938
Plaintiff:
Michael Diebold
Defendant:
Herbert Earl Wilson and Con-way Freight Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carter et al v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 5:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Carter and Wilbur H. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diagnostic Devices, Inc. v. Con-Way Freight, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00483
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Diagnostic Devices, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. n/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc. v. Diversified Elements LLC
as 4:2007cv00100
Plaintiff:
Con-Way Transportation Services, Inc. n/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Diversified Elements LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Marcus v. Wilson et al
as 8:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
Ruth Marcus, Ruth Marcus and Ruth Marcus
Defendant:
Herbert Earl Wilson, Herbert Earl Wilson, Con-way Freight Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
