Cases 21 - 30 of 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Con-way Freight Inc. et al
as 9:2016cv00056
Defendant:
Con-way Freight Inc. and Matthew Arthur Amos
Plaintiff:
Charles Allen Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Levandowski et al v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Walter Levandowski and Michelle Levandowski
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc. and Con-Way Central Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Atlas Material Testing Technology LLC D/B/A Ametek v. XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. f/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Atlas Material Testing Technology LLC D/B/A Ametek
Defendant:
XPO Logistics Freight, Inc. f/k/a Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sepulveda et al v. Con-Way Freight, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02272
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Sepulveda , Zenen Perez Flores , Ernesto Torres Gonzales and others
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logitraq, LLC v. Con-way Freight Inc.
as 6:2015cv00443
Plaintiff:
Logitraq, LLC
Defendant:
Con-way Freight Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
as 0:2015cv01517
Plaintiff:
Federated Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
Hernandez v. Con-Way Truckload, Inc., et al
as 5:2015cv00195
Defendant:
Con-Way Freight, Inc., Con-Way Truckload, Inc. and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Sophia Coy Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
