Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Virgil v. Conyers et al
as 5:2026ct03326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Virgil
Defendant:
Counselor Conyers, Acting Warden Howell, Health Administrator Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP v. Byrd et al
as 1:2026cv27307
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
Cord Byrd, KIM BARTON, Chris Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conyers v. Federal Express Corporation
as 4:2026cv04648
Plaintiff:
Adrian Conyers
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conyers v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv04542
Plaintiff:
Kevin Conyers
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conyers v. Federal Express Corporation
as 0:2026cv04539
Plaintiff:
Derrick Conyers
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Kimberly Ricketts v. USA, et al
as 26-5339
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ricketts
Defendant:
United States of America, Covington Courthouse, Covington Police Department, City of Covington and others
SHANNON v. APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER OF THE INDIANA DEP'T OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2026cv02051
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANNON
Defendant:
APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER OF THE INDIANA DEP'T OF CORRECTION, CHRISTINA CONYERS and J. ERNST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGLAS v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2026cv02030
Plaintiff:
LEVI DOUGLAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CONYERS, RAYMOND LOWERY, BRIAN KMETZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Woods v. Dennis Reagle, et al
as 26-2856
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WOODS
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, Warden, LIEUTENANT JACKSON, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
