Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WHITEHEAD V. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI SOMERSET MEDICAL DEPT, et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SCI SOMERSET MEDICAL DEPT, PSS LAFFERTY, CHCA AMANDA CROYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Zachary Croyle
as 23-3393
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ZACHARY A. CROYLE
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,
as 1:2022cv02588
Plaintiff:
Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A,, bicycle_sky, cute-anime and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
NUNEZ v. BORSTNAR et al
as 3:2020cv00208
Defendant:
LT. LEVADNUK, MARK BORSTNAR, BRANDON CROYLE and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NUNEZ v. REESMAN et al
as 3:2020cv00146
Defendant:
CO BLAIN REESMAN, CO LANDON SINCLAIR, CO TRAVIS TRESSLER and others
Plaintiff:
FERNANDO NUNEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CROYLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24664
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. CROYLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Lynch Retirement Investment Group, LLC v. Croyle
as 1:2020cv01280
Plaintiff:
The Lynch Retirement Investment Group, LLC
Defendant:
Molly Ryan Croyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
