Cases 41 - 50 of 343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kaufman v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al
as 16-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONDA KAUFMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Sternfeld v. CVS RX Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Defendant:
CVS Albany, LLC, CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sternfeld
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McKinney v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02900
Plaintiff:
Theresa McKinney
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marien v. CVS Albany, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv05531
Defendant:
CVS Albany, LLC and CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Darian Marien
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Winkelman, et al v. CVS Caremark Corporation, et al
as 15-1991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, MYRON WINKELMAN, Ex Rel, STEPHANI LEFLORE, Ex Rel and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION, CAREMARK RX, INC., CAREMARK PCS LLC and others
Slay v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 1:2015cv01315
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
