Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lopez v. Thunderbird Restaurants LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jossue Camilo Guerrero Lopez
Defendant:
Thunderbird Restaurants LLC, TB Ventures LLC, Ace High Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPEZ v. KUHN et al
as 2:2023cv02603
Plaintiff:
CAMILO L. LOPEZ
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, PATRICK NOGAN, JEFFREY CROTHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. US Distrect Attorneys Office et al
as 4:2023cv05001
Plaintiff:
Elvis Camilo Renteria Lopez, Elvis Lopez and Elvis Camillo Renteria Lopez
Defendant:
US Distrect Attorneys Office and Benton County Prosecutors Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gramajo-Lopez v. Garland
as 22-60158
Petitioner:
Carlos Camilo Gramajo-Lopez and Carlos Josue Gramajo-Barrios
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Kevin Gonzalez-Lopez v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 21-3050
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Petitioner:
KEVIN CAMILO GONZALEZ-LOPEZ
Assa Realty LLC v. The Solution Group Corp et al
as 1:2017cv22557
Plaintiff:
Assa Realty LLC
Defendant:
The Solution Group Corp, The Solution Group Corp. LLC, South Florida Equity Group Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Assa Realty LLC v. The Solution Group Corp et al
as 1:2017cv00177
Defendant:
The Solution Group Corp, The Solution Group Corp LLC, South Florida Equity Group Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Assa Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Renteria Lopez v. Whitmire et al
as 2:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Elvis Camilo Renteria Lopez
Defendant:
Megan A Whitmire and Bruce Spanner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2015cv07978
Petitioner:
CAMILO L. LOPEZ
Respondent:
STEVEN JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
