Cases 11 - 20 of 4,371
Reid v. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Wesley Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derwin Jules Jackson v. T.L. Campbell
as 5:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Derwin Jules Jackson
Respondent:
T. L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Ernest Peter Seymour, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Miller, C.O. James Schonmann, Daniel Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Saenz v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv00395
Petitioner:
Robert G. Saenz
Respondent:
T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00578
Petitioner:
Colin Campbell
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Romero v. Harpe et al
as 5:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Albert Andrew Romero
Defendant:
Steven Harpe, Susan Campbell and Robert Nogel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zinser v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2024cv10847
Petitioner:
Lawrence Zinser
Respondent:
Steve Kennedy and AGO Andrea Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Anthony-El v. Durban et al
as 3:2024cv03077
Plaintiff:
Javier Anthony-El
Defendant:
. Durban, Major Stevens, Reid Cerutti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Reynolds et al
as 4:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Kim Reynolds, Meagan Young, Ramos and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
