Cases 41 - 50 of 210
CAPLES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv06299
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOSHLYN CAPLES
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10643
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GARY VAUGHN CAPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAPLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10060
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN CAPLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caple v. USA
as 4:2021cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Glenn Caple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Montez Caples v. Charles Marmor, et al
as 20-3484
Defendant / Appellee:
Ken Pirc, Religious Activities Review Coordinator and Charles Marmor, Chaplain
Defendant:
Patti Wachtendorf, Warden, Mike Schierbrock, Security Director, Michelle Waddle, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Montez Caples
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CAPLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98396
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAPLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dimitar Dermendziev v. Robert Herzog, et al
as 20-35713
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK D. LEIGH, CUS I Unit, former, CRCC, GINA PENROSE, Associate Superintendent, former, CRCC, G. CHRIS HICKS, H Unit CUS, former, CRCC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIMITAR DERMENDZIEV
Caple v. Cumberland County Jail et al
as 5:2020ct03254
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Caple
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners and Cumberland County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
