Cases 1 - 10 of 210
United States v. Dave Caple
as 24-1648
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dave Eric Caple
Caple v. USA
as 3:2024cv00331
Petitioner:
Carnell Charles Caple, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Caple v. USA
as 4:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
Daniel Glenn Caple
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) v. Concrete Protection & Restoration, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv62334
Plaintiff:
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual)
Defendant:
Concrete Protection & Restoration, Inc., Prepcon, Inc., CPR Investment Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Caple v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03523
Plaintiff:
Coy Caple
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAPLES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23167
Plaintiff:
BREION CAPLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CAPLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2023cv00366
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN CAPLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montgomery v. Trask et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Montgomery
Defendant:
C/O Trask, Sgt. Gibbs, C/O Caple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Copez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Marquis Copez
Defendant:
Ofc. George Wilson, Lt. Sean MacKenzie and Lt. Brandon Caple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pawnee Leasing Corporation v. Caples-El Transport Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04820
Defendant:
Yahco Caples, Caples-El Transport Inc. and Yacho Caples
Plaintiff:
Pawnee Leasing Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
