Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Sandra Peters v. Aetna Inc.
as 19-2085
Defendant / Appellee:
OPTUMHEALTH CARE SOLUTIONS, INC., AETNA INCORPORATED and AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDRA M. PETERS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al v. OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority , Carolinas Physicians Network, Inc. and Managed Health Resources, Inc.
Defendant:
OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Peters v. Aetna Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Peters
Defendant:
Aetna Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company and OptumHealth Care Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pew v. Correctional Care Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01076
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Percy Pew
Defendant:
Correctional Care Solutions, Inc. and Boggio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberson et al v. Kanawha Health Care Solutions Inc
as 3:2009cv01715
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberson and Belinda S Roberson
Defendant:
Kanawha Health Care Solutions Inc and Kanawha Health Care Solutions Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gallipeau v. ABL Management Inc et al
as 3:2009cv01382
Plaintiff:
Dennis Gallipeau
Defendant:
ABL Management Inc, Correct Care Solutions Inc, Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hoover v. CCS Correct Care Solutions Inc et al
as 4:2009cv01091
Plaintiff:
Reginold Darnell Hoover
Defendant:
CCS Correct Care Solutions Inc, Nurse Monica, F Aderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Barnes v. Correct Care Solutions Inc. (C.C.S.) et al
as 1:2007cv00573
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Barnes
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions Inc. (C.C.S.), Deputy Miller and R. McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
