Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Harrison v. DPSCS - Secretary et al
as 8:2020cv02274
Defendant:
John Doe - DEA, CPL Luna, Robin Woolford and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harrison v. Quality Fuel, LLC et al
as 8:2019cv01057
Defendant:
Anwar Khoja, Quality Fuel, LLC, Salima Khoja and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Harrison et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
as 1:2018cv11276
Plaintiff:
Toni Harrison , Carl Harrison and K. H.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Sefton Harrison
as 16-17402
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEFTON CARL HARRISON
Harrison v. Flores et al
as 1:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Defendant:
Flores, Secritary of California Department Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Flores et al
as 2:2016cv01130
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Defendant:
Flores, Secritary of California Department Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carl Harrison v. Linde, et al
as 13-15401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDE, Sergeant, Mule Creek State Prison, DEBOARD, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison, LOPEZ, Correctional Officer, Mule Creek State Prison and others
Harrison et al v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
as 4:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison and Shana Harrison
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and MERS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
