Cases 31 - 40 of 520
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Christopher Marquis v. Carla Davis
as 22-7461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JAY MARQUIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLA DAVIS, ANGELA BRADSHAW, BREANNA MILLER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Dalton v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00575
Plaintiff:
Carla Marie Dalton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
Frye v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00655
Plaintiff:
Devon Frye
Defendant:
Nelson Smith, Dr. William McKenna, Dr. Daniel Mondaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-2041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
Murdock v. Ellis et al
as 3:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jason Alain Murdock
Defendant:
J. Hayden Ellis, Hutchens Law Firm LLP, J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2006 - WF1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
David Vance v. DIRECTV, LLC
as 22-1958
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID VANCE, ROXIE VANCE and CARLA SHULTZ, individually and on behalf of a class of all persons and entities similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTV, LLC
Carla Hale v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-1902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLA ANN HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
