Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Carlos D. Moore
Respondent:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Jeffery B. Belk, Nathan Burl Cain, MDOC Records Director and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Boccassini et al
as 1:2019cv08484
Defendant:
M.J. Boccassini, M.E. Wilson and R. BorJas
Plaintiff:
Carlos A. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 3:2017cv00408
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Moore
Defendant:
Karl Oliver, John Read, Doug McLeod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carlos Moore v. Dewey Bryant
as 16-60616
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS E. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR DEWEY PHILLIP BRYANT, In his Official Capacity
Carlos Moore v. Richard Mazzacone, et al
as 16-5690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS D. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT RICHARD MAZZACONE, Classification Officer, Franklin County Regional Jail, ROBERT ABRAMS, Shift Captain, Franklin County Regional Jail, FRANKLIN COUNTY REGIONAL JAIL and others
Moore v. Bryant
as 3:2016cv00151
Plaintiff:
Carlos E. Moore
Defendant:
Dewey Phillip Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Mazzacone et al
as 3:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Moore
Defendant:
Mazzacone, Abrams, Franklin County Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. USA
as 5:2013cv03035
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos B Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
