Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Romero v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 5:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Carlos D. Romero
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Caid Riggin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carlos Enrique Romero, Jr. v. Carolyn w. Colvin
as 5:2015cv01929
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Carlos Enrique Romero, Jr.
Escobar et al v. Motorino East Village Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06760
Plaintiff:
Carlos Escobar , Braulio Hernandez Velasquez , Carlos Eduardo Romero Ospina and others
Defendant:
Motorino East Village Inc. and Dimitri Vlahakis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carlos Romero-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71603
Petitioner:
CARLOS ROMERO-GARCIA, AKA Carlos Antonio Romero-Garcia
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Nunez-Romero v. USA
as 2:2014cv00306
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Nunez-Romero
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Romero v. Beavex Inc
as 3:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mejia Romero
Defendant:
Beavex Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carlos Romero v. Brian Williams, et al
as 11-17781
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARLOS LOBATO ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Romero, Jr. v. Colegio de Abogados de, et al
as 11-1906
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CARLOS A. ROMERO, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
COLEGIO COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE PUERTO RICO and HARRY ANDUZE
Romero v. Williams et al
as 2:2011cv00679
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Carlos Lobato Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cristobal Lopez et al v. Fish et al
as 2:2011cv00113
Defendant:
Jimmy Carroll Fish, Walter Jackson Fish and Christine Fish Gilliam
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Cristobal Lopez , Magdaleno Lorenzo Roman Perez , Octavio Carlos Baro Romero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
