Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Wong et al v. Colvin et al
as 3:2013cv02209
Defendant:
Barnsley Enterprise LLC, Carolyn W. Colvin, Disability Law Office NW, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Bernath and Martha Wong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phan et al v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
Truyen Gia Phan , Minh Trieu Doan , Lilyan Loc Le and others
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Albert S Roberts v. Alicia Rosenberg et al
as 2:2013cv05838
Defendant:
Fortino Castenedo, Carolyn W Colvin, Edward C Grahm and others
Plaintiff:
Albert S. Roberts
EUBANK v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00989
Plaintiff:
JANET EUBANK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sadiq v. Colvin
as 13-2530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdul-Alim A. Sadiq
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, in her individual and official capacity, Social Security Administration and J. D'Agostino, District Manager, in his individual and official capacity, Social Security Administration
Albert S Roberts v. Edward C Graham et al
as 2:2013cv04708
Defendant:
Dr Fortino Casteneda, Carolyn W Colvin, ALJ Edward C Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Albert S Roberts
Harry v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00490
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Harry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Key v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Maria Lynn Key
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sadiq v. Colvin et al
as 1:2013cv02295
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, J. D'Agostino and Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Alim A. Sadiq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carmichael v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
David Alan Carmichael
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Commonwealth of Virginia and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
