Cases 71 - 80 of 456
Carr, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv11307
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Wilfred Lee Carr, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carr v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02816
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Manford Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarnowski et al v. City of Wyandotte et al
as 2:2021cv11224
Plaintiff:
Megan Sarnowski and Thomas Sarnowski
Defendant:
City of Wyandotte, Joseph Carr, Devin Geiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2021cv10565
Plaintiff:
Jan G Wyers and Mary Carr
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. The Standard
as 1:2021cv00216
Defendant:
The Standard
Plaintiff:
Tescha Carr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Carr v. Hall
as 3:2021cv00170
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ristovski et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America et al
as 2:2021cv10452
Plaintiff:
Davon Perry, Kellie Smith, Lakeida Poe and others
Defendant:
Norwood Jewell, Alphons Iacobelli, Dennis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
McCoy et al v. United Seating & Mobility, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Carr Access, Inc, United Seating and Mobility, LLC doing business as Numotion, Covenant Health and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward McCoy, Jr and Sarah Mccoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carr v. Hall
as 1:2021cv01033
Respondent:
Hilton Hall, Jr.
Petitioner:
Derrick D. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 21-1134
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, [UNKNOWN] CURRY, Detroit Police CAT Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
