Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Caruth v. Federal Express Corporation
as 7:2026cv07740
Plaintiff:
Oneja Caruth
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Leonard v. Metcalf, et al.
as 26-4984
Plaintiff:
LOUIS LEONARD
Defendant:
D DOUGLAS METCALF, Judge overseeing civil matters, LESLIE D. CARUTHERS, CHRISTOPHER J. O'NEIL, Presiding Judge and others
Goodyear et al v. Holder et al
as 2:2026cv01816
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Goodyear and Lori Jo Valenti
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Alberto Gonzalez, Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv00062
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Caruthers Wilson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Caruth v. FCI Schuylkill Warden
as 4:2026cv00440
Petitioner:
Gregory DeQuon Caruth
Respondent:
FCI Schuylkill Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Caruth v. FCI-Schuylkill Active Warden
as 4:2025cv02494
Petitioner:
Gregory DeQuon Caruth
Respondent:
FCI-Schuylkill Active Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sampson v. USA
as 25-40773
Plaintiff:
Michael Sampson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Caruthers v. Strahl
as 4:2025cv01705
Plaintiff:
Latasha Caruthers
Defendant:
Tyler Strahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
