Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. Field Asset Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Cary Jones
Defendant:
Field Asset Services, Inc., Field Asset Services, LLC, Xome Field Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. JONES et al
as 2:2022cv06297
Plaintiff:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Defendant:
INEZ JONES, CARY JONES, VIVIAN JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02080
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patagonia, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv02834
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", wangwei, Joanna Bychowska and others
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coleman et al v. General Motors LLC.
as 1:2016cv04688
Plaintiff:
Shantell Coleman , Barbara Fields , Alisha Williams and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lively et al v. Theriot et al
as 6:2013cv02756
Defendant:
Ronald J Theriot, Andrew Bonvillian, Jedidiah Champagne and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lively and Latoya Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re Field Asset Services, Inc., et al.
as 3:2013cv00057
Plaintiff:
Fred Bowerman, Julia Bowerman, Tim Purkett and others
Defendant:
Field Asset Services LLC, Field Asset Services, Inc., Xome Field Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
INGRAM v. AMRHEIN et al
as 2:2010cv01728
Plaintiff:
NANCY INGRAM
Defendant:
RICHARD AMRHEIN , CONSOL ENERGY , CARY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyrone Jones v. USA
as 10-12581
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE CARY JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
