Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Warner v. Cole et al
as 4:2026cv04972
Plaintiff:
Cathy Warner
Defendant:
John Cole, Willaims Rankins and Shared Health Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. United States of America
as 26-3944
Plaintiff:
CATHY ZEE ANDERSON, as personal representative of the Estate of Donald S. Goldberg
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Anderson et al. v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2026sf65099
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Anderson, John Ball, Michael Bass and others
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Filing Error
as 1:2026sf65097
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Anderson, John Ball, Michael Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00479
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
David Anderson, Amee Duncan, S. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xiong v. Cimarron Insurance Company, Inc.
as 5:2026cv05140
Plaintiff:
Cathy Xiong
Defendant:
Cimarron Insurance Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
WEBB v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03957
Plaintiff:
CATHY WEBB
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Davis, Stephen v. Kallas, Kevin et al
as 3:2026cv00537
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matthew Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Kallas, Greg Van Rybroek, Dawn Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
