Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Graham v. Officer Sanchez et al
as 3:2026cv01933
Plaintiff:
Gene Graham
Defendant:
Officer Sanchez, FNU LNU, Gregory Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adrian Moon v. Tulikka Cee
as 26-7098
Plaintiff:
Adrian Damico Moon
Defendant:
Tulikka Cee, also known as Felicia Tulikka Clayton
Adrian Moon v. Jill Boddie, et al
as 26-5169
Plaintiff:
Adrian Damico Moon
Defendant:
Jill Christie Boddie, Satan, Tanya S. Chutkan and others
MOON v. CEE
as 1:2026cv00773
Defendant:
TULIKKA CEE and FELICIA TULIKKA CLAYTON
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN DAMICO MOON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Bean et al
as 2:2026cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cook
Defendant:
Jeremy Bean, James Dzurenda, Julie Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddie Walker Jr. v. Patton State Hospital et al
as 5:2025cv03627
Plaintiff:
Eddie Walker
Defendant:
Patton State Hospital, Dr Stefani Johnson, Johnathan Palmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Rafael Solomon
as 25-4558
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RAFAEL CEE-ERWIN SOLOMON, a/k/a Rip
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC v. MAJESTIC LOUNGE L.L.C. et al
as 2:2025cv13840
Plaintiff:
G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, LLC
Defendant:
MAJESTIC LOUNGE L.L.C. doing business as MR. CEE'S other KATIONZ and ERIC CORNWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pittman v. Harrison County, MS et al
as 1:2025cv00199
Plaintiff:
Portia Sheree Pittman and Mary Pittman
Defendant:
Teresa L. Martin, Clinton L. Morris, Harrison County, MS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cee Carsten et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv04645
Defendant:
3M Company, Dupont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Cee Carsten and Catherine Carsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
