Cases 31 - 40 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celis de Lopez v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00644
Defendant:
Maziar Nourizadeh, MD Wahidul Islam Mitul, Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Celis de Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Meyers v. A. Robinson
as 21-6688
Defendant / Appellee:
WAUMMADI, MICHELLE WALKER, Counselor, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Meyers v. Fleming et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
Ms. Harris, Intel Officer M. Perry, A. David Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Robinson et al
as 2:2020cv00523
Defendant:
Sgt. Ms. Dial, A. David Robinson, Daniel McGowan and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Arnold et al
as 3:2020cv07235
Defendant:
E. Sanders, Dan Bloomfield, S. Arana and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie L. Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bieling et al
as 5:2020cv01124
Defendant:
August Nordon, Burnettii, D. Bieling and others
Plaintiff:
Marsheem Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castillo v. Plaza Motors of Brooklyn, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04337
Plaintiff:
Cely Castillo
Defendant:
John Rosatti, Adam Rosatti, Plaza Motors of Brooklyn, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
