Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Rivero et al v. Galvin et al
as 1:2020cv11808
Plaintiff:
Boston Center For Independent Living, Inc., James Wice, Bay State Council of The Blind, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Department of the State Secretary and William Franics Galvin
Beverage et al v. Aging and Long-Term Service et al
as 2:2018cv00797
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Aging and Long-Term Service, Choices Center for Independent Living, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Almond and Paula Beverage
Respondent:
Matt Thompson and Tracie Buffington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Florio v. Long Island Center for Independent Living, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
Angela Florio
Defendant:
Long Island Center for Independent Living, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv03885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv12155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv12153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
