Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Paxton v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 7:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jamar Shantae Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Boyd v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv01633
Plaintiff:
Latasha Boyd and Latasha Monique Boyd
Defendant:
United States of America and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Donoghue v. Newcombe et al
as 1:2020cv02736
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mark Lilly, President Jimmy Carter Library and others
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Donoghue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frederick Banks v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-7368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, IVANKA TRUMP, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III and others
Banks v. Song et al
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak, J and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017cv03600
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, J. Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017ct03179
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark Hornak, Soo Song and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Hamilton Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 5:2017ct03133
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mike Pompeo, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017ct03077
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Trump et al
as 5:2017ct03060
Defendant:
Trump, Mitch McConnell, Governor of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Banks and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
