Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hernandez Gutierrez et al v. Building Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05928
Defendant:
Michael Angelo Gomez, Building Services, Inc., Michael A. Gomez, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Joel Hernandez Gutierrez and Angela Maria Fernandez
ESCOBAR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22920
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JHON CESAR ESCOBAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escobar et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Norma Escobar, Abisai Dominguez and Cesar Escobar
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc. and Dennis Summers
Estate Plaintiff:
Isidra Pineda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESCOBAR-PONCE v. TRIPP
as 3:2016cv00250
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR ESCOBAR-PONCE
Respondent:
WARDEN TRIPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Escobar-Ponce v. Tripp
as 5:2016hc02249
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Escobar-Ponce
Respondent:
Warden Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Julio Escobar-Ponce
as 15-40231
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR ESCOBAR-PONCE
Francis Pullano v. CCDC Guard, et al
as 14-16982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS J. PULLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CCDC GUARD, # 8170, ARB, CCDC Guard, MARY BRAMMER, NaphCare Nurse and others
USA v. Julio Escobar-Alvarado
as 13-41249
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JULIO CESAR ESCOBAR-ALVARADO, also known as Julio Escobar
Escobar v. Nico of North Miami, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv24243
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Escobar
Defendant:
Nico of North Miami, Inc. and Rafael Flores
Mediator:
Laura Bonn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Francis Pullano v. CCDC Guard, et al
as 11-16809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS J. PULLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CCDC GUARD, # 8170, ARB, CCDC Guard, MARY BRAMMER, NaphCare Nurse and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
