Cases 41 - 50 of 72
Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11311
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence, Chad F. Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sallaj v. Barr, et al
as 20-1649
Petitioner:
SHAHDAN SALLAJ
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, US IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, "ICE", CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and others
President and Fellows of Harvard College et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv11283
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Matthew Albence, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff:
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Amicus Curiae:
LinkedIn Corp., Dropbox, Inc., The Catholic University of America and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Crespo Barbosa et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv11280
Petitioner:
Carlos Henrique Barbosa and Cintia Karen Crespo Barbosa
Respondent:
Denis Riordan, Kristen M Smith, CHAD F. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Bollat Vasquez, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J.C., LUISA M. VASQUEZ PEREZ DE BOLLAT, ANDRES OSWALDO BOLLAT VASQUEZ, individually and as next friend to Luisa Marisol Vasquez Perez de Bollat, and as father and next friend to A.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Amicus Curiae:
DAVID ROBINSON, JUSTICE CENTER OF SOUTHEAST MASSACHUSETTS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Rivera-Medrano v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1573
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, CHARLES BRACKETT, Superintendent, Strafford County Department of Corrections, MARCOS CHARLES, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations, Acting Field Office Director and others
Petitioner:
KAREN ELIZABETH RIVERA-MEDRANO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
