Cases 11 - 20 of 46
SATTERFIELD v. CHANDLER
as 1:2022cv00995
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RODNEY CHANDLER, SGT ELLIS, LT. GUILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SATTERFIELD v. ROXBORO DETENTION CENTER et al
as 1:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
MARCUS ANTONIO SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
ROXBORO DETENTION CENTER, MAGISTRATE AND STAFF and CAPTAIN CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Belvin v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Chandler Belvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noble Bottling, LLC et al v. Hull & Chandler, P.A. et al
as 3:2020cv00363
Defendant:
Nathan M. Hull, Richard Gora, Joshua A. Kushner and others
Plaintiff:
Raycap Asset Holdings Ltd. and Noble Bottling, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price et al v. Pierce et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Sergeant Shatana Latice Jones, Mark Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Chandler Price, Michael Price and I. P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00569
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY CHANDLER BRYANT
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
