Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv22758
Plaintiff:
Judith Ann Smith and Charles D. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles Smith v. Robert Lewi
as 13-7206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES HENRY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. LEWIS, ALLEN W. KELLER, JR. and FAYE E. DANIELS
Defendant:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Smith et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11866
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Smith and Charles R. Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Northfield Insurance Company v. Royal Machine Works Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00072
Plaintiff:
Northfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Royal Machine Works Inc. and Charles Curtis Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Smith v. Lewis et al
as 5:2012ct03013
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Smith
Defendant:
Robert C. Lewis, Alvin W. Keller, Jr., Faye Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Smith v. Walter Davi
as 11-7687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES JERALL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
WALTER DAVIS, a/k/a W. Davis
Defendant:
B. LARGE, W. INGLE, T. MCCOY and others
Smith v. Turner et al
as 7:2011cv00230
Defendant:
T. Adams, John Doe Barrowman, John Doe Bentley and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerall Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pool et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2011cv00864
Plaintiff:
Peyton Leroy Pool and Brenda Kay Pool
Defendant:
John Henry Richardson, Jr , MC Dubose Trucking Company and Charles Patrick Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Davis et al
as 7:2010cv00263
Defendant:
W. Davis, John Garman, W. Ingle and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerall Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Charles Smith
as 10-6442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES HENRY SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
