Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Charles E. Williams et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06881
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Williams, A & W Development Co., Inc. and A and W Development Co. Inc.
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, City of Los Angeles Police Department Officer Tyson Hamoka, sued in his individual and official capacity, Matthew Lum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Charles Williams
as 22-30145
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
USA v. Charles Williams
as 21-30068
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Charles Williams
as 21-30069
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cramer v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv00586
Defendant:
R&D Williams Log Hauling, Debra Jean Williams and Charles Ronald Williams
Plaintiff:
Cari L Cramer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kenneth Hill, et al v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16759
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY WILLIAM, ANGELO ORLANDO FORD, ANDRE LAVAR WELLS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHULTZ, Capt., A Facility CSP Sac, GOMEZ, Lt., A Facility CSP Sac, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH HILL
Williams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02476
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles S Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03824
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charles R Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv02033
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Bill Gates, Steve Hickman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
