Cases 11 - 20 of 360
Williams v. Clark et al
as 5:2023hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Officer Clark and DHO Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Bullard
as 5:2023hc02140
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Warden Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Mr. Charles E. Williams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2023pq01883
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Charles Frank Williams
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Junior
as 1:2023cv21209
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry Williams
Defendant:
D. Junior
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Charles Williams v. United States
as 23-1031
Petitioner / Appellant:
Charles E. Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Williams II v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Williams II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams II v. Gonzalez
as 9:2022cv01054
Petitioner:
Charles R. Williams II
Respondent:
Esteban B. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18828
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHARLES JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
