Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bailey v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03526
Petitioner:
Raymond Charles Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Incorrectly Filed.
as 4:2021cv03523
Petitioner:
Raymond Charles Bailey, Jr. and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Patrick Cooper and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv03525
Defendant:
Raymond Charles Bailey, Jr., Bryan Collier, Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Bailey et al v. Principis Capital LLC
as 2:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Bailey, Jr., Jefferey Bailey and Charles Bailey
Defendant:
Principis Capital LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steamfitters Pension Plan et al v. A&H Mechanical Contracting, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Bailey. Jr., Robert E. Bailey, Jr., Local 439 Steamfitters Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
A&H Mechanical Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bailey, Jr. v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2014cv00146
Plaintiff:
James Charles Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina , Charles Gaylor , Michael Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey, Jr. v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
James Charles Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Charles Gaylor, Michael Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00819
Plaintiff:
James Charles Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Charles Gaylor, Michael Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Kelley et al v. Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
as 2:2008cv01758
Plaintiff:
constance kelley, constance kelley, dominique martin and others
Defendant:
Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C and Georgia Gulf Lake Charles L L C
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
