Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Kevin King v. Charles Cook, et al
as 12-1385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN KING
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES COOK, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor of Kinross Correctional Facility, in his individual capacity and JEFFREY WOODS
Jim Estes v. Norvel Arnold, et al
as 12-10185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM B. ESTES, also known as Catfish Jim Estes, also known as Jim Estes, also known as J. B. Estes, also known as James Byers Estes, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
NORVEL ARNOLD, Assistant Warden, CHARLES COOKE, Correctional Officer III and CHRISTOPHER CORILLO, Sergeant of Correctional Officers
Donovan L Haley, et al v. Leroy Baca
as 2:2012cv00092
Defendant:
Leroy Baca
Plaintiff:
Elijah Canister, Enoch Conners, Charles Cooks and others
Estes v. Arnold et al
as 2:2011cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jim B Estes
Defendant:
Norvel Arnold, Charles Cooke and Christopher Corillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Cooks v. Vincent James Oliver
as 2:2011cv08437
Plaintiff:
Mr Charles Cooks
Defendant:
Vincent James Oliver
Charles Cooks v. Hilda Smith et al
as 2:2011cv08019
Plaintiff:
Mr Charles Cooks
Defendant:
Los Angeles Police Department, Hilda Smith and Detective Hilda Smith
COOK v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv04775
Plaintiff:
CHARLES COOK
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook #128535 v. Cashler et al
as 1:2011cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Cook #128535
Defendant:
Unknown Cashler, Wade Wakefield, Mark O. Sutherby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
as 0:2011cv61092
Plaintiff:
Charles Cook
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
