Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roberts v. McFadden et al
as 6:2023cv06230
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Johnathan McFadden, Tiffany Kincade, Chardonnae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv27233
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DICKERSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodnight v. Rains County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Goodnight
Defendant:
Rains County Sheriff's Department , D'Lyn David and Charles Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joel Santoyo v. Todd Bouton, et al
as 10-40290
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL ORTEGA SANTOYO
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD BOUTON, NATASHA DUMAS, NEGEBENEBOR and others
Buddy Criner v. Todd Bouton, et al
as 09-40801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BUDDY LEE CRINER
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD BOUTON, K. NEGBENEBOR, Head Warden, CHARLES DICKERSON, Chief of Classification and others
Dickerson v. Social Services et al
as 5:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Charles Dickerson
Defendant:
Social Services and John Gustavason
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DICKERSON v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65555
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DICKERSON and CHARLES DICKERSON
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hines et al v. Jones et al
as 5:2007cv01429
Plaintiff:
Thurman Harvey Hines and Juan Garza
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Debbie Morton, Michael Addison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HESTER v. DICKERSON
as 1:2007cv01785
Plaintiff:
WARREN C. HESTER, II
Defendant:
CHARLES DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. James et al
as 3:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
Raymond Torres
Defendant:
Alphonso James, David A Turrubiate, Michell Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
