Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Spady v. Samuel, Jr.
as 1:2016cv00968
Petitioner:
Carlton R. Spady
Respondent:
Charles E. Samuel, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1756
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Katherine Laybourn
as 16-6806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHERINE LAYBOURN, Physician/Clinical Director (acting) (MD/CD), R. L. HUTCHINGS, Associate Warden (AW), CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons (DBOP) and others
Gordon v. Johns et al
as 5:2016ct03078
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Gordon
Defendant:
Tracy Johns, George Zoley, Donna Mellendick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Samuels et al
as 5:2016ct03028
Plaintiff:
Andrew Brown
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Tracy W. Johns and Manuel Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muhammad v. Laybourn et al
as 3:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Katherine Laybourn, R. L. Hutchings, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Roberts et al
as 1:2015cv03583
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Anderson
Defendant:
Kenrick H. Roberts, U.S. Department of Justice and B.O.P., Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2015cv04439
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Smith v. Coakley et al
as 5:2015cv14052
Petitioner:
Kareem Santiez Smith
Respondent:
Joe Coakley, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Leibelson v. Samuels, et. al.
as 5:2015cv12863
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Leibelson
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Louis C. Eichenlaub, John F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
