Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Fox v. Astrue
as 2:2012at00627
Plaintiff:
Charles Fox
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MEINEKE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv01624
Defendant:
JACK BINION, ALAN FINNAN, OFFICER CHARLES FOX and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY R. MEINEKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smedley v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv02266
Plaintiff:
John Smedley, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A Beard, John Kerestes, Catherine C. McVey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENSON v. BUSS et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Defendant:
RONDLE ANDERSON, CAPTAIN ROBERT BEAUTRY, JACK BINION and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY G. HENSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 1:2010cv01326
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Goodson, III
Defendant:
Catherine C. Mcvay , Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colacello v. Jackson & Perkins Wholesale Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01195
Plaintiff:
Robert A Colacello
Defendant:
Jackson & Perkins Wholesale Inc and Charles Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOODSON v. MCVAY et al
as 2:2010cv00439
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. GOODSON, III
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVAY, MICHAEL L. GREEN, JEFFREY R. IMBODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURT HILL, INC. v. HASSAN et al
as 1:2010mc00089
Plaintiff:
BURT HILL, INC.
Defendant:
HAYDAR HASSAN, CHARLES FOX, DAVID SINZ and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Burt Hill Inc. v. Hassan et al
as 1:2010mc00034
Plaintiff:
Burt Hill Inc. and Burt Hill Inc.
Defendant:
Haydar Hassan, Charles Fox, David Sinz and others
GOODWINE v. KELLER et al
as 2:2009cv01592
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODWINE, JR.
Defendant:
KELLER, BENJAMIN A. MARTINEZ, CHARLES FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
